[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130418.171846.2215092862903415243.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 17:18:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: pshelar@...ira.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.org, jesse@...ira.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] openvswitch: Use lockless genl.
From: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:16:52 -0700
> OVS locking was recently changed to have private OVS lock which
> simplified overall locking. Therefore there is no need to have
> another global genl lock to protect OVS data structures. Following
> patch uses of lockless genl family for OVS. This also allows
> more granual OVS locking using ovs_mutex for protecting OVS data
> structures, which gives more consurrencey. E.g multiple genl
> operations OVS_PACKET_CMD_EXECUTE can run in parallel, etc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>
Three problems with this submission:
1) When you resubmit a patch that's part of a series, you must repost
the entire series.
2) When you post a new version of a patch, you must list (after the
"---" delimiter) what has changed in this version.
3) When you post a new version of a patch, you must indicate this by
putting "[PATCH v2 ...] ...", for example, in the Subject line.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists