netdev - Re: [PATCH repost for-3.9] pci: avoid work_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201304181240.10239.jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il>
Date:	Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:40:09 +0300
From:	Jack Morgenstein <jackm@....mellanox.co.il>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Roland Dreier <roland@...nel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Yan Burman <yanb@...lanox.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH repost for-3.9] pci: avoid work_on_cpu for nested SRIOV probes

On Thursday 18 April 2013 11:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> But for pci_sriov_enable, the situation is actually very simple:
> VFs almost never use the same driver as the PF so the warning
> is bogus there.
> 
What about the case where the VF driver IS the same as the PF driver?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html