netdev - Re: [PATCH 08/14] netlink: implement memory mapped sendmsg()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Apr 2013 12:31:25 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] netlink: implement memory mapped sendmsg()

On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:57:43PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-04-17 at 18:47 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > Add support for mmap'ed sendmsg() to netlink. Since the kernel validates
> > received messages before processing them, the code makes sure userspace
> > can't modify the message contents after invoking sendmsg(). To do that
> > only a single mapping of the TX ring is allowed to exist and the socket
> > must not be shared. If either of these two conditions does not hold, it
> > falls back to copying.
> [...]
> 
> Is this resistant against copy_to_process()?

I don't know, there's no copy_to_process() function is the tree I'm using.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html