netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/5] net/cpsw: don't rely on netif_running() to check which device is active

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <516FE2AD.2040403@linutronix.de>
Date:	Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:10:21 +0200
From:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:	Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] net/cpsw: don't rely on netif_running() to check
 which device is active

On 04/18/2013 01:50 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote:

>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> index 3b22a36..c32780d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>> @@ -341,6 +341,7 @@ struct cpsw_priv {
>>       int                host_port;
>>       struct clk            *clk;
>>       u8                mac_addr[ETH_ALEN];
>> +    u8                active;
> Frame work is providing this feature then why you need to have additional
> book keeping in device private?

Which function? I more than happy to use it.

> 
> Regards
> Mugunthan V N

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html