[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <517168DB.4050705@mentor.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:55:07 +0100
From: Jim Baxter <jim_baxter@...tor.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
Frank Li <Frank.Li@...escale.com>,
Fugang Duan <B38611@...escale.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/1] net: fec: Enable imx6 enet checksum acceleration.
On 19/04/13 16:29, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 16:10 +0100, Jim Baxter wrote:
>>
>> +static int
>> +fec_enet_clear_csum(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ndev)
>> +{
>> + /* Only run for packets requiring a checksum. */
>> + if (skb->ip_summed != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(skb_cow_head(skb, 0)))
>> + return -1;
>> +
>> + *(__sum16 *)(skb->head + skb->csum_start + skb->csum_offset) = 0;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
>
>
>> + /* HW acceleration for ICMP TCP UDP checksum */
>> + if (fec_enet_clear_csum(skb, ndev))
>> + return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
>
> No : You must drop the packet and return NETDEV_TX_OK
>
>
>
I have no issue with changing it, but I am curious, by returning OK will
the kernel not regard it a sent packet and it will be lost?
Thank you,
Jim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists