[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1366387162.16391.21.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 08:59:22 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jim Baxter <jim_baxter@...tor.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
Frank Li <Frank.Li@...escale.com>,
Fugang Duan <B38611@...escale.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/1] net: fec: Enable imx6 enet checksum
acceleration.
On Fri, 2013-04-19 at 16:55 +0100, Jim Baxter wrote:
>
> I have no issue with changing it, but I am curious, by returning OK will
> the kernel not regard it a sent packet and it will be lost?
Answer is : The sender will loop forever trying to send this packet.
Just drop it and avoid a possible deadlock.
NETDEV_TX_BUSY is deprecated and its use is not for solving this kind of
problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists