[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51711C4E.5020704@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 15:58:30 +0530
From: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] net/cpsw: redo rx skb allocation in rx path
On 4/18/2013 5:43 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 01:50 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>>> index 559b020..f684e9b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
>>> @@ -469,43 +469,36 @@ void cpsw_tx_handler(void *token, int len, int
> <snip>
>>> - if (unlikely(!netif_running(ndev))) {
>>> - if (skb)
>>> - dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
>>> - return;
>>> + } else {
>>> + priv->stats.rx_dropped++;
>>> + new_skb = skb;
>> Why you want to drop a successfully received packet as you memory alloc
>> failed?
>> Let the stack get it processed and there after you can continue with one
>> less
>> rx skb
> Because, as I wrote, if this continues you end up without rx skbs.
> However, if you if you are under memory pressure it is possible that
> other callers in the stack have the same problem.
>
I had gone through some other drivers and found that this patch is valid
so add
Acked-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>
Regards
Mugunthan V N
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists