lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130421.155609.1660756550803892608.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 21 Apr 2013 15:56:09 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	amwang@...hat.com
Cc:	kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A regression introduced by 802.1ad support patches

From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2013 17:49:17 +0800

> On Sun, 2013-04-21 at 11:34 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> commit 77734833d78bcf0a3f58cde8b5b2424e8fc8b7e6
>> Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
>> Date:   Sun Apr 21 11:34:12 2013 +0200
>> 
>>     net: vlan: fix memory leak in vlan_info_rcu_free()
>>     
>>     The following leak is reported by kmemleak:
>>     
>>     [   86.812073] kmemleak: Found object by alias at
>> 0xffff88006ecc76f0
>>     [   86.816019] Pid: 739, comm: kworker/u:1 Not tainted 3.9.0-rc5+
>> #842
>>     [   86.816019] Call Trace:
>>     [   86.816019]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff81151c58>] find_and_get_object
>> +0x8c/0xdf
>>     [   86.816019]  [<ffffffff8190e90d>] ? vlan_info_rcu_free
>> +0x33/0x49
>>     [   86.816019]  [<ffffffff81151cbe>] delete_object_full+0x13/0x2f
>>     [   86.816019]  [<ffffffff8194bbb6>] kmemleak_free+0x26/0x45
>>     [   86.816019]  [<ffffffff8113e8c7>] slab_free_hook+0x1e/0x7b
>>     [   86.816019]  [<ffffffff81141c05>] kfree+0xce/0x14b
>>     [   86.816019]  [<ffffffff8190e90d>] vlan_info_rcu_free+0x33/0x49
>>     [   86.816019]  [<ffffffff810d0b0b>] rcu_do_batch+0x261/0x4e7
>>     
>>     The reason is that in vlan_info_rcu_free() we don't take the VLAN
>> protocol
>>     into account when iterating over the vlan_devices_array.
>>     
>>     Reported-by: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
>>     Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> 
> 
> Yes, indeed.
> 
> Tested-by: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>

Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ