netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Dual EMAC mode implementation of CPSW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51756CF2.4050602@ti.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:31:38 +0530
From:	Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>
To:	Mark Jackson <mpfj-list@...flow.co.uk>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Dual EMAC mode implementation of CPSW

On 4/22/2013 7:37 PM, Mark Jackson wrote:
> Mugunthan
>
> Can you confirm that I'm actually trying to achieve the right thing ?
>
> I have all along assumed that Dual EMAC mode would simply provide the
> kernel will a pair of independent Ethernet ports.
Yes, it will provide two network interfaces for ex eth0 and eth1
> All I am trying to do is to get both Ethernet ports working so I can
> have one port on (say) 10.0.x.x and the other on (say) 10.1.x.x
This is perfectly correct
> But there is all this reference to VLANs(in the source code and the TRM)
> ... I have not setup any VLANs.  Do I need to ?  If so, how ?
No need to setup any VLAN. VLAN are used to segregate the
two down stream ports and it will be taken care by the driver

Regards
Mugunthan V N
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html