netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC] spinlock: split out debugging check from spin_lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130423.133315.1278191592594257624.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:33:15 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	nhorman@...driver.com
Cc:	bart.vanassche@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] spinlock: split out debugging check from
 spin_lock_mutex

From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 09:44:43 -0400

> Dave, how do you feel about it?  I'm comfortable with the wait queue change I've
> proposed, but I've not received any reports of actual netpoll deadlocks (i.e.
> the mutex solution is reporting a warning, but no actual problems).  So I think
> its safe to wait a bit longer, unless you just want this squared away now.

If it's just a warning and people aren't actually hitting the
potential deadlock, it can wait.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html