netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] PF_PACKET timestamping updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130423180715.GB2675@netboy>
Date:	Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:07:15 +0200
From:	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Cc:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Paul Chavent <Paul.Chavent@...ra.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] PF_PACKET timestamping updates

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 08:33:50AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> 
> Does this solve the issue you raised, Richard? The patch does not
> change which timestamp is written, so the ring will still fall back on
> software if a hardware timestamp is unavailable. It now reports this
> to the application in tp_status, however, so that it can act
> accordingly (worst case: ignore the timestamp).

Yes, this looks like a nice solution.

Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html