[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSdoExuure7a2XPnVwP0VZS-YOrVjVEUWxe02_SeYZPi2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:20:19 -0400
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Chavent <Paul.Chavent@...ra.fr>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] packet: doc: update timestamping part
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com> wrote:
> Bring the timestamping section in sync with the implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> ---
> Documentation/networking/packet_mmap.txt | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/packet_mmap.txt b/Documentation/networking/packet_mmap.txt
> index 65efb85..23dd80e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/networking/packet_mmap.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/packet_mmap.txt
> @@ -1016,10 +1016,11 @@ retry_block:
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The PACKET_TIMESTAMP setting determines the source of the timestamp in
> -the packet meta information. If your NIC is capable of timestamping
> -packets in hardware, you can request those hardware timestamps to used.
> -Note: you may need to enable the generation of hardware timestamps with
> -SIOCSHWTSTAMP.
> +the packet meta information for mmap(2)ed RX_RING and TX_RINGs. If your
> +NIC is capable of timestamping packets in hardware, you can request those
> +hardware timestamps to be used. Note: you may need to enable the generation
> +of hardware timestamps with SIOCSHWTSTAMP (see related information from
> +Documentation/networking/timestamping.txt).
>
> PACKET_TIMESTAMP accepts the same integer bit field as
> SO_TIMESTAMPING. However, only the SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SYS_HARDWARE
> @@ -1031,8 +1032,36 @@ SOF_TIMESTAMPING_RAW_HARDWARE if both bits are set.
> req |= SOF_TIMESTAMPING_SYS_HARDWARE;
> setsockopt(fd, SOL_PACKET, PACKET_TIMESTAMP, (void *) &req, sizeof(req))
>
> -If PACKET_TIMESTAMP is not set, a software timestamp generated inside
> -the networking stack is used (the behavior before this setting was added).
> +For the mmap(2)ed ring buffers, such timestamps are stored in the
> +tpacket{,2,3}_hdr structure's tp_sec and tp_{n,u}sec members. To determine
> +what kind of timestamp has been reported, the tp_status field is binary |'ed
> +with the following possible bits ...
> +
> + TP_STATUS_TS_SYS_HARDWARE
> + TP_STATUS_TS_RAW_HARDWARE
> + TP_STATUS_TS_SOFTWARE
> +
> +... that are equivalent to its SOF_TIMESTAMPING_* counterparts. For the
> +RX_RING, if none of those 3 are set (i.e. PACKET_TIMESTAMP is not set),
> +then this means that a software fallback was invoked *within* PF_PACKET's
> +processing code (less precise).
> +
> +Getting timestamps for the TX_RING works as follows: i) fill the ring frames,
> +ii) call sendto() e.g. in blocking mode, iii) wait for status of relevant
> +frames to be updated resp. the frame handed over to the application, iv) walk
> +through the frames to pick up the individual hw/sw timestamps.
> +
> +Only (!) if transmit timestamping is enabled, then these bits are combined
> +with binary | with TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE, so you must check for that in your
> +application (e.g. !(tp_status & (TP_STATUS_SEND_REQUEST | TP_STATUS_SENDING))
> +in a first step to see if the frame belongs to the application, and then
> +one can extract the type of timestamp in a second step from tp_status)!
> +
> +If you don't care about them, thus having it disabled, checking for
> +TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE resp. TP_STATUS_WRONG_FORMAT is sufficient. If in the
> +TX_RING part only TP_STATUS_AVAILABLE is set, then the tp_sec and tp_{n,u}sec
> +members do not contain a valid value. For TX_RINGs, by default no timestamp
> +is generated!
>
> See include/linux/net_tstamp.h and Documentation/networking/timestamping
> for more information on hardware timestamps.
> --
> 1.7.11.7
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists