[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d2tlv32i.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:33:57 +0200
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] ipv6: separate out procfs code from mcast.c
Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 03:36 -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
>> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:30:20 +0800
>>
>> > This is hard to do, as in the email I replied to Stephen. So I
>> > prefer to just add a Kconfig dependency, at least for now.
>>
>> A Kconfig hack is exactly what I've told you is an unacceptable
>> solution.
>
> Please enlighten me for a third solution. :)
This is an completely untested idea....
I note that vxlan_init_net requires a successful sock_create_kern().
That implies a request_module("net-pf-...") followed by try_module_get.
So if the sock_create_kern(PF_INET6, ..) succeeds then you *know* you
have IPv6. If it fails with -EAFNOSUPPORT, then you could fall back to
sock_create_kern(PF_INET, ..) and set a flag indicating that runtime
IPv6 support is disabled. Then use this flag to allow/deny configuring
any IPv6 destinations.
You may also have to protect the IPv6 modular symbols you use with
symbol_request() or similar to prevent vxlan from depending on IPv6. I
dunno...
If nothing else, I believe this is a crazy enough hack that David may
want to reconsider one of your other two solutions :)
Bjørn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists