[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130424.195458.116577525066604563.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:54:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: brouer@...hat.com, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 3/4] net: avoid false perf interpretations in
frag code
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:48:27 -0700
> noinline can make sense when we want to avoid consuming too much stack
> space, and in this case we use the explicit noinline_for_stack.
>
> Another case would be when we know a particular function is called on
> very rare occasions, and we want to avoid compiler being smart and
> inline the function in the caller.
Yet another case is where we must force the function in a special
section, f.e. __kprobes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists