[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1366814464.8964.64.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 07:41:04 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] rps: selective flow shedding during softnet
overflow
On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 09:00 -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> I forgot about the Toepliz hash connection. I can see it makes sense here.
>
> Let me clarify:
> In the scenario i am thinking of, I have clever hardware which is smart
> enough to deal with details of identifying flow state(including
> fragementation etc) and tagging it in a DMA descriptor with 32 bit id.
> I want to be able to take the tag produced by the hardware and use
> that for rps cpu selection i.e assume the hardware has already done the
> hashing and is giving me a 32 bit id. My initial thought was skb->rxhash
> is the right spot to store this; then make get_rps_cpu() do the
> selection based on this. l4 rxhash is 1 bit which is too small.
Set skb->rxrhash to the hash your hardware computed, and skb->l4_rxhash
to 1.
Then get_rps_cpu() will use skb->rxhash happily
(and other callers of skb_get_rxhash() as well)
Not clear what you mean by fragmentation : fragmented frames have no
flow information (but the first fragment)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists