netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rps: selective flow shedding during softnet overflow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:07:23 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5] rps: selective flow shedding during softnet
 overflow

On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 20:37 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> A cpu executing the network receive path sheds packets when its input
> queue grows to netdev_max_backlog. A single high rate flow (such as a
> spoofed source DoS) can exceed a single cpu processing rate and will
> degrade throughput of other flows hashed onto the same cpu.
> 
> This patch adds a more fine grained hashtable. If the netdev backlog
> is above a threshold, IRQ cpus track the ratio of total traffic of
> each flow (using 4096 buckets, configurable). The ratio is measured
> by counting the number of packets per flow over the last 256 packets
> from the source cpu. Any flow that occupies a large fraction of this
> (set at 50%) will see packet drop while above the threshold.
> 
> Tested:
> Setup is a muli-threaded UDP echo server with network rx IRQ on cpu0,
> kernel receive (RPS) on cpu0 and application threads on cpus 2--7
> each handling 20k req/s. Throughput halves when hit with a 400 kpps
> antagonist storm. With this patch applied, antagonist overload is
> dropped and the server processes its complete load.
> 
> The patch is effective when kernel receive processing is the
> bottleneck. The above RPS scenario is a extreme, but the same is
> reached with RFS and sufficient kernel processing (iptables, packet
> socket tap, ..).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> 


>  /*
>   * Incoming packets are placed on per-cpu queues
>   */
> @@ -1808,6 +1821,10 @@ struct softnet_data {
>  	unsigned int		dropped;
>  	struct sk_buff_head	input_pkt_queue;
>  	struct napi_struct	backlog;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_FLOW_LIMIT
> +	struct sd_flow_limit	*flow_limit;
> +#endif
>  };


I guess flow_limit could be put before csd, as its a read only field by
its owner.
This need more testing and is a minor detail.

Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html