[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1304252224250.1948@ja.ssi.bg>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 22:46:55 +0300 (EEST)
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
cc: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Hans Schillstrom <hans@...illstrom.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipvs-next] ipvs: Remove
rcu_read_unlock();rcu_read_lock();
Hello,
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 22:36 +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>
> > Ok, leaving it seems reasonable.
> > Pablo, do you have any objections?
>
> I have objections.
>
> I would _add_ a cond_resched() there to explicitly do what we want
>
> Maybe a macro/inline doing this already exists.
>
> static void inline cond_resched_rcu_lock(void)
> {
> if (need_resched()) {
> rcu_read_unlock();
> cond_resched();
> rcu_read_lock();
> }
> }
Thanks, looks like a good idea to me, I guess
its place is include/linux/sched.h. Simon, can you prepare
2 patches instead, one for cond_resched_rcu_lock and second
for ipvs?
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists