[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <517AFFFB.9090201@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 00:30:19 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel.borkmann@....ee.ethz.ch>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] ARM: net: bpf_jit: make code generation less dependent
on struct sk_filter.
On 04/27/2013 12:18 AM, Xi Wang wrote:
> Thanks for CCing. One way to clean up this would be to refactor the
> bpf jit interface as:
>
> bpf_func_t bpf_jit_compile(struct sock_filter *filter, unsigned int flen);
> void bpf_jit_free(bpf_func_t bpf_func);
>
> Then both packet and seccomp filters can share the unified interface.
> Also, we don't need seccomp_filter_get_len() and other helpers.
>
> Do you want me to rebase my patch against linux-next and see how that goes?
Sure, whatever works for you. Not sure if it will still make it though.
Also, as Eric already mentioned earlier, please do not top-post your mails!
I think one reminder should be sufficient for that. ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists