lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:25:39 +0200
From:	Heiko Carstens <>
To:	Xi Wang <>
Cc:	Daniel Borkmann <>,
	"David S. Miller" <>,
	Russell King <>,
	Eric Dumazet <>,
	Will Drewry <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,,
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] seccomp filter JIT

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 03:51:40AM -0400, Xi Wang wrote:
> This patchset brings JIT support to seccomp filters for x86_64 and ARM.
> It is against the net-next tree.
> The current BPF JIT interface only accepts sk_filter, not seccomp_filter.
> Patch 1/6 refactors the interface to make it more general.
> With the refactored interface, patches 2/6 and 3/6 implement the seccomp
> BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W instruction in x86 & ARM JIT.
> Status:
> * x86_64 & ARM: JIT tested with seccomp examples.
> * powerpc [4/6]: no seccomp change - compile checked.
> * sparc [5/6] & s390 [6/6]: no seccomp change - untested.
> Sorry I have no sparc or s390 build environment here.  Can someone help
> check 5/6 and 6/6?  Thanks.

Your patches are against which tree?
They don't apply on top of linux-next or Linus' linux tree.

Btw. are there any test cases around for BPF JIT?
Not only for the new seccomp but also netfilter?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists