netdev - Re: [PATCH][net-next] gianfar: Fix reported sent bytes to BQL for Tx timestamping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1367251193.8964.326.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date:	Mon, 29 Apr 2013 08:59:53 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@...escale.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][net-next] gianfar: Fix reported sent bytes to BQL for
 Tx timestamping

On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 18:52 +0300, Claudiu Manoil wrote:

> Interesting but non-trivial, I think. Is this allowed? I mean, doesn't
> the net stack overwrite this field?

Each layer is allowed to overwrite skb->cb[]

Some network drivers already do.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html