netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH 1/1] drivers: net: cpsw: fix kernel warn on cpsw irq enable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130429.140816.128860616603400300.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:08:16 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bigeasy@...utronix.de
Cc:	mugunthanvnm@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/1] drivers: net: cpsw: fix kernel warn on
 cpsw irq enable

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:03:24 +0200

> David, how did this happen? The patch I've sent
> 
>    http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg234240.html
> 
> adds this to the probe function, according to the net-next tree it was
> added to cpsw_probe_dual_emac(). The context is similar but not exact
> the same.

This is usually I ask people to respin patches even if there are minor
fuzz differences when I try to apply this patch.

I tried to be nice and save you some work this time, 'patch' accepted
it with minor offsets, and with a cursory glance I didn't see any
problems.

Next time I'll be a hardliner and request a respin :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html