[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130430154453.GA8728@zion.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 16:44:53 +0100
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next V7 3/4] xen-netback: coalesce slots
in TX path and fix regressions
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 01:59:59PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 22.04.13 at 14:20, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com> wrote:
> > @@ -898,47 +928,78 @@ static void netbk_fatal_tx_err(struct xenvif *vif)
> >
> > static int netbk_count_requests(struct xenvif *vif,
> > struct xen_netif_tx_request *first,
> > + RING_IDX first_idx,
> > struct xen_netif_tx_request *txp,
> > int work_to_do)
> > {
> > RING_IDX cons = vif->tx.req_cons;
>
> It looks bogus and confusing to me to pass first_idx into this
> function when this really is the same as cons.
>
So the idea came from David Vrabel and went through two iterations.
Looking at the code he might be mimicking other error handling path up
in the caller, i.e. xen_netbk_tx_build_gops.
It's safe to remove first_idx I think. Just tested replacing first_idx
with cons, everything worked as before.
Wei.
> Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists