[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AE90C24D6B3A694183C094C60CF0A2F6026B721C@saturn3.aculab.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 16:53:48 +0100
From: "David Laight" <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: "Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<paulus@...ba.org>, <ambrose@...gle.com>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 net-next] af_unix: fix a fatal race with bit fields
> diff --git a/include/net/af_unix.h b/include/net/af_unix.h
> index a8836e8..dbdfd2b 100644
> --- a/include/net/af_unix.h
> +++ b/include/net/af_unix.h
> @@ -57,9 +57,10 @@ struct unix_sock {
> struct list_head link;
> atomic_long_t inflight;
> spinlock_t lock;
> - unsigned int gc_candidate : 1;
> - unsigned int gc_maybe_cycle : 1;
> unsigned char recursion_level;
> + unsigned long gc_flags;
> +#define UNIX_GC_CANDIDATE 0
> +#define UNIX_GC_MAYBE_CYCLE 1
> struct socket_wq peer_wq;
> };
Why not just change gc_candidate and gc_maybe_cycle to
unsigned char?
It might reduce the number of pad bytes somewhat.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists