[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHrpEqR6b0dy1AWsakS-z7TCe5oz5NYdpo+JWSh+K+OzPLrCVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 09:51:00 +0800
From: Frank Li <lznuaa@...il.com>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@...gutronix.de>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Frank.Li@...escale.com" <Frank.Li@...escale.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend 1/3] Revert "net: fec: fix missing napi_disable call"
2013/4/29 Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>:
> What is the exact situation which caused a
> deadlock here? I tried to see what's happening from your changelogs, but
> I'm not sure I can follow here. Wasn't the problem more of the used
> spinlocks not being IRQ-save and thus potentially creating a deadlock?
You can view below email thread.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg225240.html
The main problem network API use spin_lock_bh only now. So it does not
prefer use irq to handle skb process.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists