netdev - Re: r8169 with 3.9.0-rc9

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130502022330.GB30099@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 May 2013 21:23:31 -0500
From:	Lance Lassetter <lancelassetter@...il.com>
To:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: r8169 with 3.9.0-rc9

On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 12:31:55AM +0200, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Lance Lassetter <lancelassetter@...il.com> :
> [...]
> > Yes, it was an up to date Fedora 17.  I know this is probably redundant but
> > I also tried Realtek firmware from a Debian Sid box onto the Fedora 18
> > using testing repos with vanilla stable kernel to the same result.
> > 
> > Should I file a Red Hat bug ?
> 
> Not yet.
> 
> > Manually change IRQs, what do you think?
> 
> I need the version of the last known working Fedora 17 kernel or
> your Fedora 18 install date if you can't retrieve it.
> 
> A complete dmesg and the content of /proc/interrupts will be welcome.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Ueimor

The initial FC18 Alpha kernel was 3.6 RC2 Fedora Core kernel.

I've just started using Fedora vanilla repos for kernel just recently; although they are not pure vanilla and do contain a minimal patchset from Fedora.

I've never compiled my own kernel on the machine with the r8169 issue.

Thanks,

Lance
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html