[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1367553022.2415.55.camel@cr0>
Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 11:50:22 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Adam Baker <linux@...er-net.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next v3 2/3] bridge: only expire the mdb entry when
query is received
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 09:59 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 03:10:18PM +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> >
> > @@ -1275,7 +1277,7 @@ static void br_multicast_leave_group(struct net_bridge *br,
> > br->multicast_last_member_interval;
> >
> > if (!port) {
> > - if (mp->mglist &&
> > + if (mp->mglist && mp->timer_armed &&
> > (timer_pending(&mp->timer) ?
> > time_after(mp->timer.expires, time) :
> > try_to_del_timer_sync(&mp->timer) >= 0)) {
>
> This whole section of code should now be removed since we're now
> only arming the timer in response to a query to that group. Of
> course if we were the querier and sent out a query here then you'd
> need to simulate the reception of a query.
Hmm, this piece of code is checking if bridge itself is in the mdb entry
and if it just receives a leave, which seems still necessary... What am
I missing?
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists