netdev - Re: 3.6-rt: inet_sk_rx_dst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1367594003.7373.13.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Fri, 03 May 2013 11:13:23 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.6-rt: inet_sk_rx_dst_set() network splat

On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 07:03 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-05-03 at 10:20 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > * Steven Rostedt | 2013-05-01 20:49:39 [-0400]:
> > 
> > >Is this something going into the stable tree, or does it not affect 3.0,
> > >3.2, 3.4 or 3.6?
> > 
> > Mike Galbraith reported it against v3.6 so I would say that this is one
> > candidate. I just booted v3.4.41-rt55 and it runs for 20 minutes now
> > without any issues. Maybe it crashes after I sent the email but I hope
> > it does not :)
> 
> Thats because the particular way to trigger the bug was to use the IP
> early demux, and it was added in 3.5

Is it OK to keep it? I pulled the patch into 3.2-rt and 3.4-rt. I can
remove it if you think it's not necessary and will cause a slight
performance penalty.

Thanks,

-- Steve



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html