[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1391819.HieY1Y9pgd@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 13:23:30 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] af_unix: use freezable blocking calls in read
On Saturday, May 04, 2013 03:23:30 PM Colin Cross wrote:
> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Hello, Rafael.
> >
> > On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> >>> Heh, so you are aware of the deadlock possibilities. Good selection
> >>> of spots. For all the conversion patches.
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> >>
> >> I wonder if that includes [3/10] (just to get the record straight)?
> >
> > I think we want the lockdep annotations before these go in. I'll
> > review Colin's new series later today.
>
> Just to make sure the merge order is clear, the two patches I posted
> yesterday to reintroduce the lockdep warning in try_to_freeze()
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/3/488) need to be merged first, then I
> will repost this series on top of that one.
OK, thanks for the clarification.
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists