netdev - Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: conntrack: remove the central spinlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <kmfk9c$7g6$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date:	Thu, 9 May 2013 07:46:52 +0000 (UTC)
From:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: conntrack: remove the central spinlock

On Thu, 09 May 2013 at 06:01 GMT, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 05:43 +0000, Cong Wang wrote:
>> On Thu, 09 May 2013 at 03:04 GMT, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>> >  
>> > +#if 0
>> > +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(nf_conntrack_locks); i++)
>> > +		arch_spin_lock_init(&nf_conntrack_locks[i]);
>> > +#endif
>> > +
>> 
>> Is this intentional?
>
> What do you think ?
>
> Apparently arch_spin_lock_init() does not exist (but for ia64)
>

Either it is not expected to use arch_spin_lock directly, or it has to
provide a nop for non-IA64.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html