lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 10 May 2013 16:52:57 -0600
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	Emmanuel Grumbach <egrumbach@...il.com>
Cc:	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	John Linville <linville@...driver.com>,
	Roman Yepishev <roman.yepishev@...il.com>,
	"Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@...el.com>,
	Mike Miller <mike.miller@...com>, iss_storagedev@...com,
	Guo-Fu Tseng <cooldavid@...ldavid.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>, nic_swsd@...ltek.com,
	aacraid@...ptec.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: is L1 really disabled in iwlwifi

[+cc Rafael, other pci_disable_link_state() users]

On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 11:13:15AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Emmanuel Grumbach <egrumbach@...il.com> wrote:
> > [from Bjorn's mail]
> >> In Emmanuel's case, we don't get _OSC control, so
> >> pci_disable_link_state() does nothing.
> >
> > Right, but this is true with the specific log I sent to you. Is it
> > possible that another platform  / BIOS, we *will* get _OSC control and
> > that pci_disable_link_state() will actually do something?  In that case
> > I would prefer not to remove the call to pcie_disable_link_state().
> 
> Yes, absolutely, on many platforms we will get _OSC control, and
> pci_disable_link_state() will work as expected.  The problem is that
> the driver doesn't have a good way to know whether pci_disable_link()
> did anything or not.
> 
> Today I think we have:
> 
> 1) If the BIOS grants the OS permission to control PCIe services via
> _OSC, pci_disable_link_state() works and L1 will be disabled.
> 
> 2) If the BIOS does not grant permission, pci_disable_link_state()
> does nothing and L1 may be enabled or not depending on what
> configuration the BIOS did.
> 
> If the device really doesn't work reliably when L1 is enabled, we're
> currently at the mercy of the BIOS -- if the BIOS enables L1 but
> doesn't grant us permission via _OSC, L1 will remain enabled (as it is
> on your system).

I propose the following patch.  Any comments?


commit cd11e3f87c4d2777cf8921c0454500c9baa54b46
Author: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Date:   Fri May 10 15:54:35 2013 -0600

    PCI/ASPM: Allow drivers to disable ASPM unconditionally
    
    Some devices have hardware problems related to using ASPM.  Drivers for
    these devices use pci_disable_link_state() to prevent their device from
    entering L0s or L1.  But on platforms where the OS doesn't have permission
    to manage ASPM, pci_disable_link_state() does nothing, and the driver has
    no way to know this.
    
    Therefore, if the BIOS enables ASPM but declines (either via the FADT
    ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM bit or the _OSC method) to allow the OS to manage it,
    the device can still use ASPM and trip over the hardware issue.
    
    This patch makes pci_disable_link_state() disable ASPM unconditionally,
    regardless of whether the OS has permission to manage ASPM in general.
    
    Reported-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <egrumbach@...il.com>
    Reference: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CANUX_P3F5YhbZX3WGU-j1AGpbXb_T9Bis2ErhvKkFMtDvzatVQ@mail.gmail.com
    Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57331
    Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
index d320df6..9ef4ab8 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
@@ -718,15 +718,11 @@ void pcie_aspm_powersave_config_link(struct pci_dev *pdev)
  * pci_disable_link_state - disable pci device's link state, so the link will
  * never enter specific states
  */
-static void __pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state, bool sem,
-				     bool force)
+static void __pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state, bool sem)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *parent = pdev->bus->self;
 	struct pcie_link_state *link;
 
-	if (aspm_disabled && !force)
-		return;
-
 	if (!pci_is_pcie(pdev))
 		return;
 
@@ -757,13 +753,13 @@ static void __pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state, bool sem,
 
 void pci_disable_link_state_locked(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state)
 {
-	__pci_disable_link_state(pdev, state, false, false);
+	__pci_disable_link_state(pdev, state, false);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_disable_link_state_locked);
 
 void pci_disable_link_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, int state)
 {
-	__pci_disable_link_state(pdev, state, true, false);
+	__pci_disable_link_state(pdev, state, true);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_disable_link_state);
 
@@ -781,7 +777,7 @@ void pcie_clear_aspm(struct pci_bus *bus)
 		__pci_disable_link_state(child, PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S |
 					 PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1 |
 					 PCIE_LINK_STATE_CLKPM,
-					 false, true);
+					 false);
 	}
 }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists