[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130511.161158.1119064774406426541.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 16:11:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: amwang@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, dingtianhong@...wei.com,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [Patch net] ipv6,mcast: always hold idev->lock before mca_lock
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 15:41:54 +0800
> @@ -1369,7 +1370,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *mld_newpack(struct net_device *dev, int size)
>
> skb_reserve(skb, hlen);
>
> - if (ipv6_get_lladdr(dev, &addr_buf, IFA_F_TENTATIVE)) {
> + if (__ipv6_get_lladdr(idev, &addr_buf, IFA_F_TENTATIVE)) {
> /* <draft-ietf-magma-mld-source-05.txt>:
> * use unspecified address as the source address
> * when a valid link-local address is not available.
You aren't necessarily going to be holding idev->lock, therefore you can't
just do a lockless traversal of idev->addr_list here.
Yes, you can elide the rcu_read_lock() because you have a known reference
to 'idev' in these paths, but you can't get rid of the address list locking
altogether.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists