[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130515150433.1eb4c73a@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 15:04:33 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: dlstevens@...ibm.com, amwang@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vxlan: force user to set port value
On Wed, 15 May 2013 14:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> Stephen, this doesn't work either.
>
> You're breaking people's scripts.
>
> Even worse, you're breaking things, and your error message doesn't
> even tell the user how to get the previous behavior. You're telling
> them how to get new behavior, which they probably don't give a
> crap about. They want their existing stuff to work.
>
> Stop being in denial, we are stuck with the old port number default.
>
> Again, we cannot change this default without breaking something which
> we've already deployed to users.
>
> If this port number issue was so important, we should have done
> something about it when we integrated vxlan. But we didn't, so we
> have to live with the consequences.
>
> Now is far too late to change the default.
So you want RHEL customers to continue to use the pre-standard Cisco
port in their clouds and be incompatible with standards?
I made a mistake in the initial implementation using that value and every user for time immemorial
has to suffer.
Since every distro patches iproute anyway, let them keep the non-standard
compatibility if that is what they demand.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists