[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130519195809.GA3237@x61s.Speedport_W_921V_1_21_000>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 21:58:10 +0200
From: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
To: David Hauweele <david@...weele.net>
Cc: Alexander Smirnov <alex.bluesman.smirnov@...il.com>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-zigbee-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] 6lowpan: Fix fragmentation with link-local
compressed addresses
Hi David,
can you use a link-layer address on the current net-next kernel?
I am asking because I can't use a link-layer address currently.
Your patch doesn't help to solve my problem with link-layer addresses.
To your patch:
We get the link-layer addresses from skb not from the allocated
frame->skb.
Here is the code:
_saddr = mac_cb(skb)->sa.hwaddr;
_daddr = mac_cb(skb)->da.hwaddr;
Here is skb != frame->skb so we don't need to copy it to frame->skb->cb
because we already the link-layer addresses from skb->cb.
Is there another place in the code where we get the link-layer addresses
from allocated "frame" structure?
Regards
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists