[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1305201049210.3374@fry.nucleusys.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 10:49:46 +0300 (EEST)
From: Petko Manolov <petkan@...leusys.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc: romieu@...zoreil.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drivers: net: usb: rtl8150: bug fixing and cleanup
On Mon, 20 May 2013, David Miller wrote:
> From: Petko Manolov <petkan@...leusys.com>
> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 10:18:17 +0300 (EEST)
>
> > On Mon, 20 May 2013, David Miller wrote:
> >
> >> From: Petko Manolov <petkan@...leusys.com>
> >> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 10:09:00 +0300 (EEST)
> >>
> >> > What about the .c/.h split?
> >>
> >> I have no strong opinion either way.
> >
> > OK, so i'll prepare new patch series that coalesce my original patch #1
> > and #2, and apply the Francois suggestion about using the generic
> > netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align() in the interrupt path.
> >
> > Which tree would you want me to diff against?
>
> As has been explained to you already, cleanups belong in 'net-next',
> bug fixes belong in 'net'.
>
> If you series has both, you have to submit them separately. Submit
> the bug fixes to 'net', then the next time I merge 'net' into 'net-next'
> you can submit the cleanups on top against 'net-next'.
Got it. Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists