[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5872DA217C2FF7488B20897D84F904E7338FD1E5@nkgeml511-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 03:06:25 +0000
From: Qinchuanyu <qinchuanyu@...wei.com>
To: "rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
"dhowells@...hat.com" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>
CC: " (kvm@...r.kernel.org)" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
" (netdev@...r.kernel.org)" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] vhost: get 2% performance improved by reducing spin_lock
race in vhost_work_queue
Right now the wake_up_process func is included in spin_lock/unlock, but it could be done outside the spin_lock.
I have test it with kernel 3.0.27 and guest suse11-sp2, it provide 2%-3% net performance improved.
Signed-off-by: Chuanyu Qin <qinchuanyu@...wei.com>
--- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c 2013-05-20 10:36:30.000000000 +0800
+++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c 2013-05-20 10:36:54.000000000 +0800
@@ -144,9 +144,10 @@
if (list_empty(&work->node)) {
list_add_tail(&work->node, &dev->work_list);
work->queue_seq++;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->work_lock, flags);
wake_up_process(dev->worker);
- }
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->work_lock, flags);
+ } else
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->work_lock, flags);
}
void vhost_poll_queue(struct vhost_poll *poll)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists