[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.2.00.1305211855120.9230@git.silcnet.org>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 19:02:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: Pekka Riikonen <priikone@....fi>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
cc: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, HPA <hpa@...or.com>,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/4] net: implement support for low latency
socket polling
On Tue, 21 May 2013, Eric Dumazet wrote:
: > > Alternatively, use a napi_id instead of a pointer.
: >
: > I'm not sure I understand what you propose.
:
: Oh well.
:
: To get a pointer to a struct net_device, we can use ifindex, and do a
: rcu lookup into a hash table to get the net_device. We do not need
: {pointer,ifindex} but {ifindex} is enough
:
: My suggestion is to not have skb->skb_ref but skb->napi_index : Its safe
: to copy its value from skb->napi_index to sk->napi_index without
: refcounting.
:
: All NAPI need to get a unique napi_index, and be inserted in a hash
: table for immediate/fast lookup.
:
Maybe even that's not needed. Couldn't skb->queue_mapping give the
correct NAPI instance in multiqueue nics? The NAPI instance could be made
easily available from skb->dev. In any case an index is much better than
a new pointer.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists