[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130521142537.00a9ccb7ca4aa81f553b61cf@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 14:25:37 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree
Hi Andrew,
Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c between commit aafc787e41fd ("arm: bpf_jit: can
call module_free() from any context") from the net-next tree and commit
"ARM: net: bpf_jit: make code generation less dependent on struct
sk_filter" from the akpm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
index f50d223,2dab3e6..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
@@@ -926,8 -926,32 +925,21 @@@ out
return;
}
+ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp)
+ {
+ struct jit_ctx ctx;
+
+ memset(&ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx));
+ ctx.prog_len = fp->len;
+ ctx.prog_insns = fp->insns;
+
+ __bpf_jit_compile(&ctx);
+ if (ctx.target)
+ fp->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.target;
+ }
+
-static void bpf_jit_free_worker(struct work_struct *work)
-{
- module_free(NULL, work);
-}
-
void bpf_jit_free(struct sk_filter *fp)
{
- struct work_struct *work;
-
- if (fp->bpf_func != sk_run_filter) {
- work = (struct work_struct *)fp->bpf_func;
-
- INIT_WORK(work, bpf_jit_free_worker);
- schedule_work(work);
- }
+ if (fp->bpf_func != sk_run_filter)
+ module_free(NULL, fp->bpf_func);
}
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists