netdev - linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130521143225.c74bc044cc1e6d4cd58bf317@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 21 May 2013 14:32:25 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree

Hi Andrew,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c between commit ed900ffb73e3 ("ppc:
bpf_jit: can call module_free() from any context") from the net-next tree
and commit "bpf: add comments explaining the schedule_work() operation"
from the akpm tree.

The former means that the latter is no longer required, so I used the
former and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped