[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130521122845.GD16412@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 14:28:45 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: sk_page_frag_refill OOM killing spree
Hi Eric,
seems like sk_page_frag_refill() can cause oom-killer invocation:
postgres invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x42d0, order=3, oom_score_adj=0
Pid: 10551, comm: postgres Tainted: G O 3.8.6-5.g613ca40-smp #1
Call Trace:
[<c106dbd5>] ? dump_header+0x60/0x191
[<c1133d3a>] ? ___ratelimit+0xb2/0xc4
[<c106dfd3>] ? oom_kill_process+0x61/0x2d1
[<c1030042>] ? has_capability_noaudit+0x1c/0x23
[<c106df0f>] ? oom_badness+0x8c/0xef
[<c106e446>] ? out_of_memory+0x203/0x247
[<c107128a>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x42b/0x4c3
[<c11fa66a>] ? sk_page_frag_refill+0x6a/0xd2
[<c1233548>] ? tcp_sendmsg+0x3e8/0x7c6
[<c124f34b>] ? inet_sendmsg+0x6b/0x75
[<c11f74d8>] ? sock_sendmsg+0x8d/0xa6
[<c11f7b83>] ? sys_sendto+0x105/0x130
[<c1025927>] ? __kunmap_atomic+0x62/0x8a
[<c1025940>] ? __kunmap_atomic+0x7b/0x8a
[<c1073d78>] ? __lru_cache_add+0x18/0x47
[<c10812f9>] ? handle_pte_fault+0x745/0x751
[<c1025a2d>] ? kmap_atomic_prot+0xd3/0xf1
[<c10817da>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x112/0x121
[<c11f7be5>] ? sys_send+0x37/0x3b
The system is busy, so, order-3 alloc failure doesn't strike me as odd.
There are no allocation failures with order != 3.
Sometimes this can happen in very short sucession, i.e.
and oom-killer did end up zapping 30 processes or so.
My question is, should sk_page_frag_refill use __GFP_NORETRY, at least
for order 3 requests?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists