netdev - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next V2 1/2] xen-netback: split event channels support for Xen backend driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130522153506.GA4543@zion.uk.xensource.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 May 2013 16:35:06 +0100
From:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	<ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH net-next V2 1/2] xen-netback: split event
 channels support for Xen backend driver

On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:17:54AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > +/* Provide an option to disable split event channels at load time as
> > + * event channels are limited resource. Split event channels are
> > + * enabled by default.
> > + */
> > +unsigned int feature_split_event_channels = 1;
> > +module_param(feature_split_event_channels, uint, 0644);
> 
> How about just 'seperate_tx_rx_irq' ? Much easier to comprehend I think?

Sure. I'm not particularly picky about names and sometimes bad at
picking a comprehensible name.

But, I guess I should use "sepArate_tx_rx_irq" rather than
"sepErate_tx_rx_irq".


Wei.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html