[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1369250772.3301.349.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 12:26:12 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 nf-next] netfilter: conntrack: remove the central
spinlock
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 11:20 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 10:47 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> >
> > nf_conntrack_lock is a monolithic lock and suffers from huge contention
> > on current generation servers (8 or more core/threads).
> []
> > diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h
> []
> > @@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ struct nf_conn {
> > plus 1 for any connection(s) we are `master' for */
> > struct nf_conntrack ct_general;
> >
> > - spinlock_t lock;
> > + spinlock_t lock;
> > + u16 cpu;
>
> trivia:
>
> What's the real value in not using int here?
>
On some machines, sizeof(spinlock_t) is 2
So this addition doesn't increase size of the structure, as I fill a
hole.
Thats the case on x86 when NR_CPUS < 256
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists