[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <519D1D61.8030500@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 15:32:49 -0400
From: annie li <annie.li@...cle.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
CC: xen-devel@...ts.xen.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jbeulich@...e.com,
ian.campbell@...rix.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
david.vrabel@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V3 2/3] xen-netfront: split event channels support
for Xen frontend driver
On 2013-5-22 12:34, Wei Liu wrote:
> [...]
>
> -static irqreturn_t xennet_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +static irqreturn_t xennet_tx_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> {
> - struct net_device *dev = dev_id;
> - struct netfront_info *np = netdev_priv(dev);
> + struct netfront_info *np = dev_id;
> + struct net_device *dev = np->netdev;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&np->tx_lock, flags);
> + xennet_tx_buf_gc(dev);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&np->tx_lock, flags);
>
> - if (likely(netif_carrier_ok(dev))) {
> - xennet_tx_buf_gc(dev);
> - /* Under tx_lock: protects access to rx shared-ring indexes. */
> - if (RING_HAS_UNCONSUMED_RESPONSES(&np->rx))
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t xennet_rx_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct netfront_info *np = dev_id;
> + struct net_device *dev = np->netdev;
> +
> + if (likely(netif_carrier_ok(dev) &&
> + RING_HAS_UNCONSUMED_RESPONSES(&np->rx)))
> napi_schedule(&np->napi);
> - }
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&np->tx_lock, flags);
Originally, netfront protects access to rx shared-ring with tx_lock, you
remove this protection here. It is better to protect the ring access by
a sperate rx_lock then.
Thanks
Annie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists