[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1369257171.2143.120.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 14:12:51 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 nf-next] netfilter: conntrack: remove the central
spinlock
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 13:48 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 13:38 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> > u16 for cpu is hardly used at all.
>
> Its used in network tree.
>
> The day it has to change, don't worry, I think we'll be able to handle
> it.
>
> For the meantime, I do not want to add 4 more bytes to conntrack
> structure, its already bloated enough.
I wrote "nice" already, no worries.
btw: netdevice.h could possibly convert xmit_lock_owner
to u16 as well for that same 4 byte savings if the -1
test was converted too.
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 60584b1..c38cd29 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ struct netdev_queue {
* write mostly part
*/
spinlock_t _xmit_lock ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
- int xmit_lock_owner;
+ u16 xmit_lock_owner;
/*
* please use this field instead of dev->trans_start
*/
@@ -2453,7 +2453,7 @@ static inline void __netif_tx_unlock_bh(struct netdev_queue *txq)
static inline void txq_trans_update(struct netdev_queue *txq)
{
- if (txq->xmit_lock_owner != -1)
+ if (txq->xmit_lock_owner != (u16)-1)
txq->trans_start = jiffies;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists