netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130522001458.af0f4ab5.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 22 May 2013 00:14:58 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dborkman@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, nschichan@...ebox.fr
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next
 tree

On Wed, 22 May 2013 00:07:48 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 13:04:38 -0700
> 
> > Nicolas, I think the patches need a re-check so I'll drop the versions
> > which I presently have.  Please refresh, retest and resend when
> > convenient?  It'll need to be against linux-next, which is where the
> > conflicting (vfree/module_free) changes have occurred.
> 
> How about working against net-next and submitting your patches to netdev
> just like the rest of the world?
> 

Well that's probably practical.  But the patchset is a seccomp
enhancement for (at present) ARM.  Not exactly net stuff, or anything
which netdev readers are likely to spend a lot of time testing and
reviewing.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html