netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <519C8DF3.7000605@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 May 2013 11:20:51 +0200
From:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the net-next tree

On 05/22/2013 01:54 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Tue, 21 May 2013 09:44:13 +0200 Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Also seccomp_jit_free() needs a change otherwise the kernel won't build
>> with CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER_JIT enabled since the work_struct is initialized
>> with the bpf_jit_free_worker() callback, which is no longer existent.
>>
>> Do you want me to send you a patch?
>
> Yes, please.

In case this is still needed, patch attached. That should fix it.

View attachment "0001-arm-bpf_jit-fixup-build-error-in-seccomp_jit_free.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1396 bytes)