[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130523.121037.84357412382839522.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 12:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: gururaja.hebbar@...com
Cc: mugunthanvnm@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
benoit.cousson@...aro.orgm, paul@...an.com
Subject: Re: [net-next resend PATCH 1/6] net: cpsw: enhance pinctrl support
From: "Hebbar, Gururaja" <gururaja.hebbar@...com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 11:28:38 +0000
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:27:41, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>
>> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 15:24:58 +0530
>>
>> > + priv->pins_default = pinctrl_lookup_state(priv->pinctrl,
>> > + PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT);
>>
>> This is not indented correctly.
>>
>> Argument on the second, and subsequent, lines of a function call
>> must start at the first column after the openning parenthesis of
>> the function call itself.
>
> Well, if I am correct, doing so will make the line cross 80 character limit.
> If you could (please I ask), can you let me know how it can be handled in
> above situation. I will make the changes/corrections and re-send it.
>
> Thanks a lot in advance.
Avoid the deep indentation by coding the basic block into a helper
function.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists