[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130523202156.GJ17411@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 22:21:56 +0200
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: David Stevens <dlstevens@...ibm.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Subject: Re: possible bug in IPv6 MLD retransmissions
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 07:30:39AM -0400, David Stevens wrote:
> Second, I think doing this on all LL addresses unconditionally isn't a
> good
> idea. If some configuration is using thousands of LL addrs for reasons of
> their
> own, they would suddenly be blasted with unexpected MLD reports where
> they have none now. I don't see why tracking it would be such a problem --
> if nothing else, you could simply add a counter for the number of valid LL
> addrs
> incremented on DAD completion, and send these whenever it transitions from
> 0 to 1.
While testing some code, I noticed that we seem to have a similar
problem with the generation of router soliciations. We send out
MAX_RTR_SOLICITATIONS for each link-local address dad completion.
So the tracking could have some more users and I will move it to
addrconf.c. I'll hope I cope with all the tiny races I found in my last
version. :)
Greetings,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists