[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <519D7452.8050405@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 09:43:46 +0800
From: dingtianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
CC: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: add synchronize_net() after netdev_rx_handler_unregister
On 2013/5/23 2:30, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 22-05-2013 12:42, dingtianhong wrote:
>
>> commit 00cfec3748 (net: add a synchronize_net() ...) add a synchronize_net()
>
> Please specify complete summary line of this commit.
>
ok, I will modify and send again, just tell me your opinion, thanks.
>> in netdev_rx_handler_unregister() to guarantee the rx_handler is NULL when
>> rx_handler_data is a non NULL in rcu_read_lock().
>>
>> so the caller should not use netdev_rx_handler_unregister in atomic as it may
>> schedule and sleep, the commit fcd99434f
>
> You forgot to specify the summary line of this commit.
>
>> fix the bug in bond release, but the
>> problem is no action to guarantee the rx_handler_data is NULL when bond release,
>> so add synchronize_net() and fix it.
>
>> This patch adds more comments to netdev_rx_handler_unregister().
>
>> Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists