[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130524170335.GY31290@titan.lakedaemon.net>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 13:03:35 -0400
From: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: mv643xx_eth: proper initialization for
Kirkwood SoCs
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 06:53:15PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > Why are you not keen on this? It seems like normal device driver
> > > practice, that is what the data field of of_device_id is typically
> > > used for..
> >
> > I'm not keen on it because we don't have a document saying "All kirkwood
> > SoCs need PSC1 set to X after reset." We know it, but have we tested
> > the 6282?
>
> 6282 looses its MAC address, that much i know. I've no idea about
> PSC1, but if its MAC address behaviour is the same as 6281, is expect
> PSC1 is the same.
Do you have a board set up for testing you could try Sebastian's
forthcoming series on (with "marvell,kirkwood-eth")?
thx,
Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists