[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <519F1698.3050301@keymile.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 09:28:24 +0200
From: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@...mile.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: napi layer and packet throttling
Hi Ben,
On 05/24/2013 12:27 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 13:52 +0200, Holger Brunck wrote:
>> b) Packet-Throttling
>> Here the description says "NAPI-compliant drivers can often cause packets to be
>> dropped in the network adaptor itself, before the kernel sees them at all."
>>
>> This is exactly what I need for my usecase. But I don't see any hints how this
>> can be implemented with the napi layer.
> [...]
>
> If the RX ring is not cleaned and refilled quickly enough, the network
> controller will naturally start to drop packets. It's not something you
> should do explicitly in the driver.
>
yes. But what if the remaining amount of packets which are getting through the
napi_poll function into the linux system are still to many and generate
therefore a to high softirq load on the system which leads to the problems I
see. Ok I could use a smaller amount of RX ring buffers, but then the system
would get more intolerant for RX bursts what I don't want. I would like to
protect the system if someone sends continuously a high packet rate to the
interface, similar to DoS attacks.
Regards
Holger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists